Senin, 14 Desember 2015

Concussion Movie & Coaching Ethos

There is no bigger issue the sport of football is facing today than the cloud of anxiety associated with long-term affects of head trauma. We have addressed this previously, but not to the extent we will be exposed today. This season we are presented with a social impetus that will move this issue into the minds of a wider audience than just football players and coaches. The movie, Concussion, amplifies the wake started with HBO's "Head Games" (2010) and Frontline's "League of Denial" (2013) with narratives too strong to ignore. The movie is a profitable venue because it is something on everyone's mind; everyone wants to learn more about this issue. 





Understand that a movie is an over-dramatization of life stories, but can serve as an effective means to illustrate a perspective (The Insider, Thank You For Smoking, Erin Brockovich, The Informant!, etc). Both the sport of football, as an institution, and the harrowing stories of NFL veterans suffering from diminished mental capacity evoke powerful emotions. With so much at play in these discussions, I feel it is important to clearly define a path of constructive dialogue. For the betterment of the sport, coaches should serve as vanguards of this dialogue, improving the sport and protecting the trust parents and our communities have in our programs. Teaming with our training staff is job number one so that we can have a better appreciation for the monitoring and treatment of at-risk athletes. In addition, educating ourselves on the physical impact of the game has to be as important as learning how to run Power against an Under front.


   

 To start, it will be easier to find the root issue by declaring what this conversation should NOT be about: 

  • NFL as a business: This isn't about defining liability or benefits between worker and employer. 
  • NFL as entertainment: This isn't about how players should be framed/viewed in the media. 
  • NFL as an embodiment of football: Football is a platform to deliver the entertainment product. The conditions this entertainment industry fosters leads to an increased risk/exposure to these variables. Recognize the emotions behind this product association (also exists in NCAA). Emotions are real, but not fact. 
  • The value of team sports: We are not weighing the benefits of organized competition against risk of injury. 
  • Value of mental toughness: Don't frame the risk of brain damage as if it were any other physical obstacle. Physical rehab (muscle/ligament repair) is an entirely different animal compared with brain tissue. 
  • Solely about concussions: The answers we are seeking are the origins and scope of degenerative brain conditions, known as CTE. While concussions are an issue and cited as a precursor to the condition, what we are really after is how to better understand how to better protect the brain against all effects, not just those that produce "knockouts". An oft-sited study , "Incidence, Clinical Course, and Predictors of Prolonged Recovery Time Following Sport-Related Concussion in High School and College Athletes (2010)", provides a wealth of data that set the ground work for concussion protocols. 


How we address the next questions in light of the new information presented, will shape participation in the game of football for 14 - 24 year old males in the coming generations. I would encourage coaches this off-season to spend some time reading or viewing material presented by physicians on the long-term impact of brain trauma. While there are no absolutes at this stage in discovery, there is plenty of information available so that we can provide intelligent feedback to those with concerns. From an educated foundation, we can participate in discussions with medical professionals to find solutions. 

The sport of football has faced these challenges before. In the 70's, it was serious ligament damage (coming back from an ACL tear was unheard of 40 years ago), then it was spinal injuries, then it was dehydration, then it was heat stroke, then it was concussions, now it is long-term degenerative brain condition. I am not suggesting these are equal injuries, but its not like this is anything the sport cannot overcome. 

Moving forward, the questions, as I see it, we need to find answers for are as follows: 

What can this age group tolerate? What is the likelihood of risk / frequency? 

  • I reserve the right to be absolutely wrong later, but there is a world of difference between the hits a 15 year old takes in a game takes, a 23 year old kid takes in DIII ball, and a career in the NFL. This is really like comparing a prop plane pilot vs a jet pilot vs an astronaut. They all are flyers, but are not subjected to the same stimulus / environment. Just because they advance in the field based on an increasing set of criteria, doesn't mean the parallels remain consistent (a collision with a player of equal size does not produce the same relative force to the body). The mass/force generated by high school athletes is largely within the realm that the human body can adapt itself to.  The mass/force and frequency that can be generated in an arena played with (super) humans is easily beyond which the fragile human body can ever account for.


How do you determine the scope of injury? What factors are needed to produce a long-term degenerative situation? 

  • Products like Shockbox are a step in the right direction, but is not the panacea. It provides quantitative data that is needed to better define what transpires on the field. The next step will be to scientifically provide the conclusions of how the brain responds. Keep in mind, proper equipment and fit is important to protect the physical body, but will not prevent brain trauma caused by explosive movements. Helmets will prevent head injuries and can reduce the force inflicted on the head, but the brain is a free-floating organ (like dropping an egg within a container). With free market solutions, we have to temper our expectations because not all these products intent on selling parents on piece of mind will offer real solutions. With such a willing market (and incentives from the DoD), business will fill this void with anything to make a buck.



   


Temper against the risk of rushing absolute answers creates a false security in an uncertain environment. 

  •  Thankfully we are rapidly advancing technology to better understand the brain and CNS that just wasn't possible 30 years ago. Embrace this tide of innovation and knowledge. We simply did not have the technology until very recently to accurately study evidence of brain trauma outside of an autopsy. The brain trauma (onset disease) is a precursor to CTE. Of a representative sample of HS players, we need to understand how pervasive the evidence of the disease is. This is what we need to determine the scope of risk to give everyone an actionable decision. These studies help us better understand human physiology in the ever-evolving science of neurology and will benefit not only football but all contact sports (Hockey, wrestling, soccer, rugby, etc).

Selasa, 08 Desember 2015

Periodization Off-Season Conditioning

Now is the time of year that most programs are just now getting over the siege of the 2015 season.  Kids and coaches are on break and August 2016 is an eternity away.  Most program's approach strength and conditioning in January the same as they do in July.  This off-season, I would encourage you and your staff to sit down and assess how you wish to develop your athletes this off-season to have them primed for competition in game 1.

Below is a sample of a program we built a decade ago with this approach in mind. The goal was to reset our athletes to square one after the semester break.  While we use a maintenance lifting routine during the season , it is difficult to achieve gains during the season.  Therefore, we go back to the basics for core development as well as serving as a great teaching time for our incoming freshmen and underclassmen. 

When you look at the season from January until August, you have quite a bit of time to nurture athletes and work off a foundation of movements.  We structured our 32-week off-season conditioning as a 4 day week broken into 4 phases.  The goal here was to set aside enough time to lay a foundation of proper technique and foster team building in the weight room that would build the core of our team in the fall. During the early phases, we brought in outside instructors, spending a good portion of our time encouraging and involving underclassmen.  This program was built to be progressively challenging while being dynamic enough to change exercises from week to week.


BASE (4 weeks)- heavy emphasis on strict movements with very low resistance.  Focusing on the concentric and eccentric phases of each base movement, safety and correct form are stressed. Even if you're benching 405, we have you go back to weight training 101 and dedicate your body to recuperating and drilling proper form.  This is a great time to educate the kids on nutrition and associate the weight room with positive experiences.


DEVELOPMENT (5 weeks) - with the movement foundations set, we progress on true resistance training and teach the intensity to train correctly (set the tempo). The key here is to get kids paired in groups and always moving, either lifting or spotting.


PEAK (6 weeks) - Traditional pyramid building program where we expect to achieve our biggest gains. We ramp up the intensity and push the kids to add more resistance to achieve more.



CHAMPIONSHIP (8 weeks)- Geared toward challenging the body's limitations and improve stability of movement - more isolation movements.


This particular program was centered around the push-pull  combination to keep the body fresh for the type of movement  it follows.



After the Base phase, we featured one day a month of some type of physical competition, ensuring that the same type of kids didn't win every month.  Some competitions were focused on speed, while others strength, then others just agility. 


This particular routine is available for download here

Be sure to check out these other posts on Strength and Conditioning.

While we're on the subject of off-season planning and coordination, use this as a template to define your staff's short-term and long-term goals for your program's success.






Here are several other blogs you should bookmark and regularly tune into this off-season
nflbreakdowns.com
www.footballstudyhall.com

www.syedschemes.com

efootballflix.com

http://jameslightfootball.com/
http://lifeafterfootballblog.com/




Selasa, 01 Desember 2015

Coaching the 2-Gap Nose


Even or Odd, that is the question.  With more and more defenses opting into basing out of an odd front, I figured I would pass on some notes of my experiences from a true 3-4 defense.  We've touched on this before, but I believe the true multiple defense of today's game is consists of just 2 interior tackles, 1 defensive end and then 1 hybrid 'tweener' or undersized end/speed rusher.  You can get by with these type of players to get into whatever front you need.  Many defenses base out of these odd personnel groups, but are actually playing an even defense, in the traditional sense. These defenses may play a zero technique, but only require this player to control 1 gap.  In addition, they may cover both guards (2i or 3 tech) and control 2-gaps on a read, but aren't actually using a 2-gap technique. 
There isn't much out there on coaching up the zero technique.  The only thing I've seen addressing this is the Mike Fanoga's "Developing 2-gap Linemen For The 3-4 Defense" video and I don't know that anyone has garnered anything of value off it.  The video just reviews basic DL drills and Coach Fanoga mumbling through unorganized cutups of his teams with no meaningful coaching points. In this installment, I would like to provide my thoughts on coaching a 2-gap zero technique in an odd front.




The main goal of the nose tackle is to control both A gaps. This is usually to free up fast flow inside linebacker in the bubble. I believe its important to appreciate what this position's function is; be responsible for immediate action to both A gaps.  At the bare minimum, the nose should be an obstacle in these lanes.  At best, the nose is an immediate threat to the ball once its snapped. I have never bought into the notion of using defensive linemen as blockers for linebackers.  I'm all for linemen controlling gaps (laterally), but in no way should a defensive lineman be passive chattel to cover up deficiencies of other team members. 


So many times I see coaches simply expecting the nose to post the center and then grab the guard and either just hold both of them at the line or to knock out both blockers and make a tackle. This does the position and the scheme a disservice.  I  believe what these coaches are thinking is akin to the nose just teeing off on the center, essentially tackling him, and finding the ball.  That will likely work if you have Lyle Alzado playing for you, but since no scheme should be built around one player, you will need to develop important skill sets on your roster to actually play this position with technique.  What often happens when players are coached in this haphazard fashion is the player remains raw, getting off high (pad level) and get pushed off the line and into the linebackers.  This is typically followed by coaches chewing ass and throwing another (or simply a bigger) body in at nose, only to get the same result. Reaping the benefit of having a 2-gap nose(and choosing to run this scheme)  requires a significant investment in skill development.  You have to do more than just put a large body at zero technique and expect to 2-gap.


BASIC SKILL SET
With every defensive technique, recognize these are skills that must be developed and repped correctly to gain any benefit from.  Simply talking about it will not generate any benefit.  I believe you should equip your players with rudimentary skills first to ensure they are competent to do the bare minimum of their position. Once they've mastered the basics of the position, then move on to advanced techniques for exceptional performance. Trying to advance from stance to double counter moves in one practice will only frustrate coaches and player alike and retard development.



Developing the skillset for the nose is simply to perfect a low, coiled stance and get extension on the center.  The stance should not be staggered and should be slightly wider than shoulder-width with the tail in the air and the chest as low as possible. Starting from a 4-point stance makes training this stance easiest. As the player builds a comfort level in this position, they can remove the off hand from the ground (but still keep the arm low).  





 

this is a good example of pad level and hip flexion in the stance

Remind the player that they are trying to make a compact spring, squeezing their mass into a small space.  The stance actually should be uncomfortable with 70% of the weight forward compelling the nose to move forward at the first opportunity.


Hip explosion and hand placement are key here and this skill cannot be drilled too much.  For what we're after here, it isn't just a stance and start rep, the key is to get comfortable crowding the target (ball) with a high tail and exploding up into the target which would be only a foot away.  The closer the nose is to the ball, the greater immediate threat he becomes to the center's snap (and the ability for the offense to account for both A gaps). While it is best to rep this against a 1-man or 7-man sled, this can be repped against a wall, a goalpost, or any other solid, stationary target. Focus on hips and (palms of the) hands. It isn't enough to just fall into a target, it is important that the first movement has the player striking the target with both hands as his first 6" step hits the ground.  This contact should force the hips to roll forward, raising the chest into the target.  

The next step would square up the weight of the nose, both feet underneath the frame of the body, building momentum to extend the arms from the hips. It wouldn't be unusual to spend a full week of Indy time repping just stance, strike and extension.  Once this is consistently achieved, speed up the reps to instill a footwork rhythm of your linemen; we're not just coaching the technique but also the tempo it has to be achieved.  They should have a muscle memory BANG-BANG response of get-off-to-extension. What the coach is going for here is to make this reaction so ingrained in the player that they aren't thinking of how to get to a leverage position, but they can be fully keyed on their read response. 



Since the double-team is the primary threat to the nose, this should be the focus of work for the nose to recognize.  The rule is to "fight the pressure", though there are a couple of techniques to use to be effective. The bare minimum would be to post the center, then immediately drop the near knee of where the pressure comes. At worst, this creates a pile of the guard and center to the point of attack (closing the running window) and at best, it propels the nose into the running lane to make a play on the ball.  I feel this is an effective technique for beginning players because it is simple to teach and actually benefits the linebackers.  The worst thing a coaching staff can do is be adamant that the nose must hold the point against two blockers when he hasn't been sufficiently trained to succeed against that matchup.  By dropping the knee, you ensure the player stays low and cuts the playside guard.   You can rep this halfway and be satisfied with creating a pile in A gap on first down block pressure. Once your kids get good at 1) stance 2) strike 3) extension and 4) knee drop/pile, then begin fully repping the drop and seat roll into the running lane. What this looks like is the knee goes down and the hips turn to plant the butt on the ground (back is to the blockers).  

When this takes place, the nose is compacting his body once again to coil out of his original stance. Once the nose hits his butt, he should pull his near elbow violently back. This is the same motion as "starting the lawnmower" to spin the flywheel from a pull cord. This  pulling motion should be violent enough to swing the hips 180 degrees into the gap so that you end up in a 4-point stance in B gap.

Your nose should be competent enough to start if they can consistently perform these basic components.  The only other blocks you will deal with is a reach or a pass set. Obviously, on reach the nose will get his extension on the center and fight laterally to keep outside leverage on the ball.  On pass set, the nose should at first be instructed to only bull rush with a rip escape.


  1. Coiled stance/ crowd the ball
  1. 6" punch / beat the snapping hand
  2. Extension / elbows
  3. Run the knees, keep feet moving….what to do now?
  4. Fight pressure / drop or squeeze gap
  1. First step wins


ADVANCED SKILL SET

Now that we have covered basic components of the position, you can gain the most out of the position by advancing their skill sets.  The get-off and leverage is vital to success on the line.  The zero technique has the advantage of squaring off against an offensive player preoccupied with snapping the ball. Foster a competition during pre-practice for the nose to grab / trap the center's snapping hand in his crotch.  This instills in the nose the aggressive, crowd-the-ball stance and focusing on the target of the center's arm below the elbow.  Without the ability to keep the nose at bay, the center is immediately beat and could potentially foul the exchange.  The more of an immediate threat the nose is to the center 's first step, the more the nose can pressure the center's performance of snapping the ball.

Improving the stance and strike repetitions would also include a gap step escape.  Again, the repetitions are to enforce technique and, more importantly, the tempo the linemen executes each movement. Add the rip and swim moves to the nose' s repertoire, so that the progression goes stance, explosion strike, full extension, and escape. The coaching points for the each are as follows:

Rip
  1. Extension, trap near wrist/elbow with outside hand
  2. Outside foot steps outside the blocker's body to set the base
  1. Inside foot crosses the blocker's body and sets just outside the gap foot. The target is to get hip-to-hip with the blocker.
  1. Punch the inside arm into the gap to lift the blocker's gap arm out of the way.  Violently rip the bicep to the earhole of the blocker.


Swim
  1. Extension, swat the near forearm down with the outside hand
  2. Outside foot steps outside the blocker's body to set the base
  1. Inside foot crosses the blocker's body and sets just outside the gap foot. The target is to get hip-to-hip with the blocker.
  2. Jab the inside hand just outside the neck of the blocker to swim over his shoulder.  Keep the arm tight to the body, don't wind up.  The action should be to throw the punch (outside) the face of the blocker and, "stab him in the kidneys with an ice pick".


Improving the double-team

When your nose starts showing an aptitude to keep his feet and maintain leverage on the center, you can get more out of him by teaching him how to split the double team.  When the nose extends on the center (post) and feels pressure from the driving guard, he can drop his hips from the center and turn his butt into the guard and shuffle laterally, turning away from the pressure.  This will tie up both guard and center and keep the nose in position to still play playside A gap and any inside cutback. The key here is to not let the guard and center get hip-to-hip to work an effective double-team.  If the nose stays square, the driving guard can squeeze his hips inside and get on track with the center.  When the nose kicks back his hips, much like an offensive baskteball player backing into a defender, he's performing an action not unlike an offensive tackle that is getting beat by a bull rush who would drop his hips, spread his legs to gain low, stopping leverage on a rusher. With the guard tied up past 5 quick steps of the nose, the playside inside linebacker should have a clean window into B gap to make a play.  This technique is also effective versus zone combos where the drive blocker would slam the nose then work to the second level after the backside reacher can overtake the nose. This "turn away butt block" would prevent any zone combo from getting free.

Reading the center's first step



They key to coaching tempo so well that your players end up with what will seem like a long time once they've made that first step. In their mind, they will want to go from stance-to-escape within a full second and a half.  This amounts to 3 quick steps of the nose's feet from their stance.  For them to stay ahead, they will have to anticipate what body position the center wants to work toward.  What I have found was fighting the very first step of the center as a sign of pressure (i.e. reading the center's feet for 2-gap). 

If a center wants to post for a double team to his right, he will step with his right foot.  If a center wants to reach the nose to his left, he will step with his left foot. After snapping the ball, the center has to make up for that 1/2 step he lost during the snap motion.  He won't be skip pulling to the perimeter and if he false steps, he would create an open window along the offensive line.  The point being, the center is rushing to get caught up with the track his fellow linemen are on.  If the nose attacks the center's first step he will more than likely be correct on which gap is threatened.  The whole sit and wait to get creamed by double-teams is a nebulous read for the nose.  If you wait until the guard makes contact on the down block, its often too late to make a move. 

The nose would have an explosive get off, gain extension (regain base), then once the center makes a move to fight for the leverage he needs, THEN the nose attacks that move because we really don't care about dealing with the center (we want the ball) and because we're posting and not just shooting, we're keeping the ILBs free of trash.


This isn't shooting gaps as a nose, it is premised on posting that center, as you normally would.  This extra step advantage would provide the nose the ability to break any double team before it gets unified, giving the nose a one-on-one matchup he can win.  How this is coached is to work against another player's movement with the first step (left, right, retreat) as the trigger to (balanced strike extension and half-man escape) indicate which side the nose should work his escape. 

Here are some additional readings on the (true) 3-4 defense

3-4 Defense Article from NFL Magazine

North Iowa 3-4

Drills for 3-4 Linemen

Marvin Lewis 3-4 Clinic

Pete Jenkins on using 2-gap linemen





Senin, 23 November 2015

Coup d'œil

Inspired by the insightful post of Alex Kirby at Life After Football , I wanted to offer feedback on this same process with an emphasis on developing a routine for interpreting live football broadcasts. The method I'll outline is one that I've used for years while being in the box for gameday communication.



What we'll outline here is how to assess the next play that is going to be run before that play starts.  The beauty here is this is a skill you can hone with hundreds of reps at your leisure. Likely, you will already be watching 12 hours of football each weekend that you can practice with.  Let's assume you watch 3 or 4 football games in a weekend. That translates to roughly 450 - 500 repetitions to train your brain with instant feedback to develop this skill. This allows you to stay engaged with any broadcast, playing this game (within a game broadcast) but also developing a skillset invaluable to football coordinating.  Watching games dispassionately, just focusing on formations and areas of the field,  allows you to develop an intelligence towards predicting outcomes.  Naturally, the type of plays called will depend on the play-caller, but those become exceptions to the rule.  The more you exercise this technique, the more scenarios you will have to draw from because you will receive instant feedback once the play is run (were you right or wrong? What did you learn from your hypothesis?).



When all is said and done, it really is the commander's coup d'œil, his ability to see things simply, to identify the whole business of war completely with himself, that is the essence of good generalship. Only if the mind works in this comprehensive fashion can it achieve the freedom it needs to dominate events and not be dominated by them. -Carl von Clausewitz 

The intent of this exercise is to use the 25 second play clock to assess what is on the field and the possible outcomes after the ball is snapped.  The goal here is to consolidate all the information you see on the field and assume the probable outcome within 15 seconds, leaving 10 seconds on the play clock. I believe if you examine the game from a defensive mindset, it becomes easier to process what transpires after the snap and compartmentalize the components of a play, making your viewing experience more enjoyable. The following represents a cascading punchlist of data elements you will use to deduce a  probable outcome in a given situation.



3 Seconds
This bit of information can be garnered immediately after a play has concluded.

Field position - where at on the field is the offense trying to advance the ball? When backed up inside their own 20, offense will be looking simply to convert the down and get out of the shadow of their own end zone. Between the 40s, the objective is looking to break an explosive play to reach the red zone.  Inside the red zone, offense look to take advantage of the limited depth of the field (usually resulting in some form of man-to-man coverage) for a score.

Down and Distance - the area of the field and distance for the conversion influences offenses on how aggressive they will need to be while mitigating a negative yardage play.
Time remaining - more often than not, this really only matters in the 4th quarter in a close game.  Depending on the momentum the offense is in, you can start reducing the time remaining by the average drive duration and figure out how many possessions are left before the game expires.  If there are 10 minutes left in the game and the offense is trailing by more than 10, they would need to operate under the assumption that they'll only have 2-3 possessions left in the game and need to quicken the pace or reach for more explosive plays.

Hash - this makes a big difference outside of NFL, where the field width can magnify the space between the ball and the furthest receiver.  The chasm makes it difficult for defenses to disguise their intentions (coverage/pressure).


Personnel - what kind of players  are in the game? The offense has run 3 tight ends on the field. Okay, we're probably not expecting a vertical passing concept. Some network television broadcasts have begun listing personnel between plays.



7 Seconds
Pare down the unknowns by paying attention to the formation and how the defense matches with their front.
Formations
3-man surface: Pro strength or compressed trips?
1-back/2-back: 21 personnel? Find exceptions on why they won't be running Power/Iso because that is probably what is coming.
Balanced / unbalanced: is the formation symmetrical (expect it to be, then work the exception), is there more numbers to a side of the field, are there more than 3 players on one side of the ball?
What is the run strength of the formation (assume they will run to this side)? Is there a TE or H-back added to the box ?
Slot:  What I'm looking for most often is what is the span of the slot (2 receivers) and how the defensive backs align (how deep are they? Inside/outside leverage?). 


  • Is it slot (where is the potential #3 receiver) or trips (is the single receiver closed/split or to the field)?
  • Are the receivers compressed - what grass are they squeezing you to get?
  • Is it to the field? If so, where are they in relation to the numbers, to the hash?
  • Is the back offset? To or away from the field?

Defense matchup
The shell of the defensive coverage is a good indication of how the defense will respond and give a tip of who the force player will be (safety, corner, backer, end?).

As an example, if you see twins to the field and you have 2 defenders over these receivers no deeper than 5 yards with a safety over the top (in relation to both), assume a run inside because that would likely be the most successful scenario simply by the numbers remaining in the box.  


  • Determine the slot coverage being used here; will it be man or will someone drop to cover the curl/flat?
  • Is the front playing even or odd? Is the center covered (nose) or are they playing shades?
  • How many rushing threats are in the box? Who would the offense declare the mike and slide coverage away from? 
  • Are there any "out-of-box" defenders in close proximity to the box to be included as a potential rusher/primary run support defender?


Use this information to start making logical assumptions. Eliminate the exceptions and determine the most probable plays to run.



12 Seconds
Leverage / Matchup -
What is the target of opportunity? What is the most plausible scenario given this front/coverage and formation?

Example: You're watching Iowa offense. It's 2nd and 8, at mid-field and they come out in 12 personnel with double-tight Ace.  Assume they are going to run stretch until you see something glaringly obvious (safeties drop down or a receiver motions across the formation). 


This also helps you visualize any support fits of the defense and who is going to be in the best position to make the play on defense. Use the example above, you expect an immediate inside run, what defender could present the biggest problem.  If they run zone left, which defender would be in the best position (just by alignment) to make the play on the ball carrier?

list the probabilities, then select the most appropriate response

16 - 20 Seconds
Reassess what you've just assumed.  What have these teams been successful with? What is necessary just to convert the down?
Visualize how your assumed play will run against the given defense.  How will that play be blocked and what are the risks to this play being successful?


Post-Snap
What is the first step at the snap? Is it flow / web / split action by the backs? Is that congruent with where the line is going?
Did anything happen that contradicts what you assumed would happen?

* this is actually a game I used to have our linebackers play during film study, where we would show opponent film one frame at a time.  The winner would be the first guy to call out the play being run (based on the fewest frames/steps).

The bottom line is compile all the presnap data, determine the likely scenarios, then once the ball is snapped find the exceptions that would immediately alert you of the special play (blitz, counter, play-action, screen).



Example: if either of these safeties in a 2-high look were to drop, immediately we know we have an alert that could become pressure or an indicator that the safety is playing zone and will  be covering the curl/flat area (looking for back out to his side / perimeter run defender). Does the other safety rotate to the middle of the field or does he jump the slot receiver on his side (telling you the middle of the field is wide open)


When you look at the game this way, it eliminates a lot of the unknowns when the ball is snapped.  When you do this, you have the capability to focus on seeing technique, particularly on the pivotal players needed to make the play successful (i.e. a pulling guard in space on sweep).


This exercise is a great practice to condition your mind to interpret on-field patterns.  This is also why I am a big fan of watching games via ESPN 3's Spidercam or just reviewing presnap alignment pictures on your own.  Using the 6-10 seconds of presnap post-huddle alignments as a sort of football Rorschach Test, you quickly have to interpret what you see and list all the possible conclusions that would take place simply by leverage of each player.






I hope this has provided a framework to enjoy broadcasts while strengthening your "football IQ" to build off of.  We welcome your feedback, so drop your recommendations or concerns in the comments section below.